Action! Reaction! A film blog covering the banished and ever-lowly genre of action movies.

Friday, February 27, 2009

Review: Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li


Kristin Kreuk desperately looks for a new career path in Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li

Terrible performances. Uninspired writing. Loose, uneven direction... these are things you would expect from (great cinematographer-turned lowly action director) Andrzej Bartkowiak. But one would also expect a guiltily-fun, action-packed B-experience, and this new turn on the popular Street Fighter franchise doesn't even do that—it can't even have fun.

The notorious 1994 Street Fighter had fun. Jackie Chan's great parody from City Hunter had fun. But no, no fun here as, like with anything in the new millennium, the premise of the game is taken in a 'grittier, more realistic' direction while still trying to hold on to the original palette of what ultimately is a video game, and at least where I come from, video games are supposed to be fun, right? All of Bartkowiak's other directorial works (Romeo Must Die, Exit Wounds, Cradle 2 the Grave, Doom) have frequent comic relief, and even when a good portion of it doesn't work, some of it does, and some of it does wonderfully (the great comic pairing of Tom Arnold and Anthony Anderson comes to mind, as well as Doom's self-parodying moments). In any given action movie, you expect there to be a lot of bad jokes, but Chris Klein's douchebag interpretation of Keanu Reeves just doesn't work and his tough-slut counterpart, played by Moon Bloodgood, doesn't either. The only thing is funny about the movie is Michael Clarke Duncan's voice (which caused a few initial laughs in the theater) and the way Neal McDonough's Bison is somehow super-fly when making an entrance.

And speaking of Bison, where the hell is Guile anyways? Was Justin Marks to scared to write him into the script after the picture-perfect casting of Van Damme? A lot of the characters are left out, possibly for a hinted-at potential sequel, but also possibly because they just didn't want to mess up their (unsuccessful) plan at making Street Fighter 'real.'

Propelling TV-star Kristin Kreuk to the silver screen seems like a good idea—and I say 'seems' because her acting talent, even in action terms, cannot be judged by this passable, mediocre throwaway of a film. Rounding up smaller actioners such as Robin Shou, Michael Clarke Duncan, and Neal McDonough also 'seemed' like a good idea, but that didn't exactly pan out either. In the end, Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li seemed like a good idea, but ultimately, it wasn't.


* out of ****

~ Patrick Fryberger

4 comments:

Poetrash said...

Original sucked!

Pat F. said...

Not as much as your girlfriend did last night.

(!)

LOL JK WTF CHILL

Poetrash said...

seriously you have no idea...people that train in the shaolin they are strong and also they develop the kind of strength that does damage on the inside of the body but not the outside of the body... for example when you punch someone and they have a bruise it hurts yeah it means they're in pain...whereas people from shoalin develop that type of strength you can't see a bruise or anything. but the person who receives the blow is actually hurting from the inside. probably like a fracture bone etc

Pat F. said...

Well, yes, I'll give you that, the actors were indeed "hurting on the inside" considering just how bad of a decision it was to do this movie, whereas in the original it was just a bruise that eventually went away (maybe not for the late-great Raul Julia, but I digress).

If you need more persuasion, just watch what has been called the "Greatest Moment in Cinematic History:"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGyhexhPQlw




Thanks for visiting!